The historic shipyard was duly auctioned off yesterday: read the report in the Tacoma News Tribune here.  There was only one bidder - a hitherto unknown entity called Washington Landmark Holdings LLC - and the price paid was $6,001,192.64, which just happens to be the amount owed by Martinac to Alaskan Leader Fisheries.  Let's hope the new owner has a plan that involves building ships, not condos.  July 19, 2014.

I know this discussion is very simplistic and the future of a facility as important as Ingalls deserves examination in detail, but the purpose of this column is just to review the situation and to get you thinking, not to answer all the questions.  You have to pay me for that.  July 18, 2014.

Irving Shipbuilding is spending multi-millions to modernize and expand its Halifax shipyard and now its shopping list is one item longer, and one very expensive item at that.  The Halifax Shipping News reports that their Panamax floating dry-dock, known as the Nova Dock, is going to have to be scrapped.  Read the story here.  This is astonishing news, because it's only 30 years old and a well-maintained floater should have a useful economic life of at least 50 years.  (Think of all the WWII-vintage docks that are still in service.)  This dock was built by M.I.L. in 1983, to a top-of the-line design, with better-than-average wing-wall cranes.  I guess that it just hasn't been maintained properly.  Not good news.  July 13, 2014.

Bracewell Marine Group, of Richmond BC, normally builds luxury custom and semi-custom yachts.  Visit them here.  Now they are going to try their hand in the commercial market, building two McIlwain-designed harbor tugs for Ledcor Marine Group.  Read Ledcor's announcement here.  (That's one of their fleet on the right.)  The Canadian maritime industry continues to amaze.  July 13, 2014.

The first of the Royal Navy's two new carriers, the 64,000-ton future HMS Queen Elizabeth, (R 08), was christened yesterday at Rosyth Dockyard, on the Firth of Forth.  Very 21st-century - the Queen pushed a button which released a lever holding a bottle which duly shattered on the ship's bow.  Not actually an event that I would normally comment on, except for the fact that the bottle used did not contain champagne.  It was a bottle of single malt whisky, specifically Bowmore, from the oldest of the 14 distilleries on the isle of Islay.  Much more appropriate, I'm sure you all agree.  This also raises the intriguing question of what happens to naval ship construction in Britain if Scotland secedes from the Union.  In addition to Rosyth, two of BAE's three shipbuilding yards are in Scotland - the surface combatant builder formerly known as Yarrows and the auxiliary builder formerly known as Fairfield.  July 5, 2014.

STX Canada Marine, undoubtedly one of the best firms of naval architects around, has been sold yet again.  (What is it?  Eight times in the past 20 years?)  This time it's Vard which has bought it and the name will be changed to Vard Marine Inc.  Who, do I hear you cry?  Vard is a Norwegian company, although it's stock is traded on the Singapore exchange.  It's a big player in OSV construction, with ten mid-sized shipyards in Norway, Romania, Brazil and Vietnam - that's Langsten Verft on the right.  Visit them at www.vard.com.  Until recently, Vard was called STX OSV and was owned by Korea's STX Corporation, as was STX Marine Canada, but with separate lines of communication to top management in Seoul.  It is now 55% owned by Fincantieri, who also, as you know, own Marinette Marine and Bay Shipbuilding.  Read Vard's brace of announcements here and here.  The deal is priced at NOK 65 million and includes STX USA Marine, in Houston, and STX Canada Marine's Ottawa office.  So, is this good news or bad?  It has to be good news, if only because it leaves the existing management team in place and gives them access to Vard's portfolio of designs.  The negative has to be the involvement of Fincantieri: I used to be favorably disposed to Fincantieri but I've been turned off by what they're doing to Marinette.  Let's hope that's an aberration and the Vard experience will be positive.  July 4, 2014.

The shipbuilding industry is so important to the Canadian economy that BC Ferries has ordered three new ships from Remontowa Shipbuilding, in Gdansk.  Read the story in the Vancouver Sun here.  The Canadian taxpayer is forking over billions of dollars for sole-source contracts with bargebuilder Vancouver Shipyards and patrol craft builder Halifax Shipyards which will allow them to upgrade their capabilities for the construction of a new generation of oceangoing ships for the Canadian Navy and Coast Guard, ships which will cost four or five times what they would cost in a European shipyard and take two or three times as long to build.  Meanwhile, the BC taxpayer - BC Ferries - can't get a Canadian yard to bid on its requirements.  Isn't there something awry about this logic?  Would it not have been a whole lot cheaper to buy the Navy and Coast Guard ships in Europe or Korea and to stimulate construction of all the commercial stuff in Canadian shipyards?  I mean, we're not talking nuclear subs here.  Good grief!  The U.S. shipbuilding industry, Jones Act and all, is a model of rational behavior by comparison.  And you thought that Canadians were sensible people.  July 4, 2014.

P.S.: Additional info.  I'm told that Matson is looking at Horizon's three Alaskan-trade ships, the ones built by Bay, while Crowley is looking at their Hawaiian-trade ships.  That leaves the Puerto Rican-trade for TOTE, if they're interested.  Intriguing.  July 2, 2014.

Sometimes it seems that Vigor can do nothing right.  Today's bad news is that the GAO has thrown out Vigor's protest of the Navy's award of Puget Sound-area CVN work to GD.  This is work that Todd had handled for years and should have been an automatic for Vigor.  But no.  Read the ruling here.  June 25, 2014.

The news that Martinac Shipbuilding is in danger not only of closing but, worse, of being essentially liquidated in a bankruptcy auction, is profoundly discouraging.  Read the report in the Tacoma News Tribune here.  This is a shipyard with a distinguished construction record, going back 90 years: visit them here and see their construction record here.  And its recent history makes most of those small yards on the Gulf Coast look like amateurs.  This is a shipyard that's worth keeping.  Will someone please step up and write a check?  One of the ironies of this particular situation is that it doesn't take much to forestall the threatened foreclosure, although it would still be necessary to  structure a new ownership arrangement that would hold up in the longer term.  So, who could be Martinac's white knight?  Not easy.  The problem is that it doesn't fit well into any of the existing shipyard groups - GD, VTHM, BAE, Fincantieri, Bollinger, Trinity.  It may have to be an operator.  Foss is the obvious choice, because they are known to be planning a new yard, to replace their Seattle yard, but Martinac is not big enough for their needs.  Anyway, I'm sure that Mr. Martinac is already busy calling around the likely candidates.  Wish him luck.  Mid-Summer's Day, 2014.

Auctioneers James G. Murphy & Co. are scheduling a sale of shipbuilding equipment at Vigor's Portland shipyard.  Read about it here.  I guess they have more than they need.  Can't think why that might be.  June 20, 2014.

Word is that the President of Marinette Marine, Chuck Goddard, is moving to Washington to work for the parent company, Fincantieri Marine Group, and will be replaced by Jan Allman, who is currently VP, Manufacturing, at Navistar - formerly International Harvester - and who was previously the first female plant manager at Ford Motor Company.  Good luck, Ms Allman.  I'm sure she knows that Henry Ford started his career in a shipyard - serving an apprenticeship with Detroit Shipbuilding.  June 18, 2014.

The Navy continues to dump old ships.  Today it was announced that the carrier Constellation will shortly join her sisters, the Forrestal and the Saratoga, for recycling in Brownsville TX.  Read the story in the Navy Times here.  And I just discovered that there's a draft RFP on the DLA web site for the recycling of two CGs, a DD and three FFGs.  Find it here.  June 18, 2014.

With nine of the Sentinel-class FRCs delivered, the Coast Guard has apparently found it possible to start retiring the Island-class cutters that they replace.  I thought that we needed all the boats we could lay our hands on, but seemingly not.  Read the sale announcement for the Bainbridge Island, (WPB 1343), here.  This is one of the younger boats of the class, too: so, why aren't we giving her to one of our allies?  There must be something wrong with her.  June 18, 2014.

Our leading builder of OSVs has bought our leading builder of megayachts: the Chouests, of Edison Chouest Offshore, have bought the assets of Westport Yachts, which operates four shipyards in Washington State - that's their Westport yard on the right.  Westport started out in 1964, building fishing vessels, but now only builds composite-hull, standard-design megayachts.  I don't see any formal announcements anywhere but it's widely covered in the local press and the yacht industry press.  Read the report in Megayacht News here.  This is, obviously, a good time to buy a yacht builder, the industry not having recovered yet from the recession.  It will be interesting to watch the Chouest clan light a fire under their new division.  June 9, 2014.

P.S.:  Read the GAO's report here.  In brief, all five bidders were ok on every measure except past performance, where Ingalls and VTHM were severely criticized.  Interesting reading.

British Columbia Ferries has awarded a contract to Vancouver Shipyards for construction of a cable ferry.  The contract price is CDN 15 million and the delivery is scheduled for the first quarter of 2015.  Read the announcement from BC Ferries here and that from Vancouver Shipyards here.  Note that this monster contract apparently fills VSY up and they won't be bidding on anything else for a while.  Huh?  Anyway, it'll be good practice for all those billion-dollar RCN and CCG contracts that are coming down the pike.  February 27, 2014.

Those folks who are opposed to the Keystone pipeline need their heads examining, but, however that argument turns out, we still have the challenge of getting all that crude out of the Dakotas safely and efficiently.  Let's consider the alternatives.  The cheapest and safest solution is pipelines, but nobody seems to like pipelines.  The next cheapest and safest is barge transportation, but nobody's talking barges, they've skipped ahead to rail, which is significantly more expensive and apparently not all that safe.  So, why not barges?  The Missouri River rises in western Montana and comes pouring down through the Dakotas until, two thousand miles later, it runs into the Mississippi.  At one time it was navigable pretty much the whole way but now it's described as navigable only from Sioux City on down: what would it take to extend the waterway up to Pierre, or even to Bismarck?  Has anyone looked at that?  Anyway, why wait?  Let's start moving crude on barges.  We don't need to move it all: start modestly and demonstrate that barges beat railcars any day of the week.  So, ok then.  February 27, 2014.

The two shipbuilders that were not selected for the U.S. Coast Guard's OPC Phase I contracts, Ingalls Shipbuilding and VT Halter Marine, have filed protests with the GAO.  Read the Defense News story here.  If you are interested, the docket number for both is B.409541.1.  Do they have a chance?  Probably not.  Protests are rarely successful, especially these days, when Contracting Officers have much less independent authority than they used to have: sometimes it seems that they can't go to the bathroom without permission from the lawyers.  In this case, however, the PCO is Carl McGill, who has been there for ever and knows what he's doing: small chance of any mistakes.  The other thing is that the cost of a protest is rarely justified by the size of the contract.  In this case, however, the contract is clearly big enough to justify the cost, so why not?  But that does not mean that this protest is necessarily valid.  My bet is that both protests will be rejected.  February 27, 2014.

It's been obvious for ages that our armed services were going to have to get smaller, what with the Cold War being over and most of the services' missions being focused more on smaller-scale challenges.  But none of the services seem to be capable of making rational plans involving affordable weapons.  The Navy may or may not be the worst offender, but its ability to burn up huge quantities of the taxpayers' money designing and building ridiculously gold-plated boats (like the one on the right) has certainly been impressive.  Is it not astonishing that we've got to the point that the Secretary of Defense has to tell them what they need to do?  All three service secretaries should have resigned or been fired.  Read SECDEF's statement here and the Defense News report here.  Now, as far as the shipbuilding sector is concerned, where do we go from here?  First, the Congress needs to back DoD on the planned reductions - 11 cruisers, 3 amphibs and probably one carrier - and on the planned shift from the LCS to a new class of some kind of corvette or OPV - which needs, of course, to be a standard, off-the-shelf design.  Second, everyone needs to get on board with fully-funded multi-year procurements for every program.  Third, the Navy needs to give serious consideration to single-sourcing: carriers at NNS, subs at EB, DDGs at BIW, amphibs at Ingalls and auxiliaries at NASSCO.  The absence of competition will be seen as a problem, of course, but this can be handled (a) by restructuring the form of contract to provide real incentives for cutting costs and delivering early, and (b) by managing the programs with zero changes - if changes must be made, they can do them post-delivery.  None of this will happen, of course.  The Congress and the Navy will continue to stumble along from one unstructured decision to the next, in that ongoing demonstration of incompetence which we have been living with now for 25 years.  Depressing.  February 25, 2014.

A musical about the decline of shipbuilding?  Yes, indeed, and why not?  Almost all of us in this industry have experienced the misery and the pain associated with the shift of big-ship shipbuilding to the Far East and the dramatic ups and downs of the small-ship markets, all made so much worse by the fact that in so many communities the shipyard is the major employer and when it goes, nothing replaces it.  Sting grew up in Wallsend, on the Tyne, in the shadow of the cranes and shops at that great yard, Swan Hunter, where his father worked.  He's created an amazing musical about Swan's decline, a work of art, something everyone should see.  Click on the logo on the right to go to the web site and learn more.  And Sting himself is doing a concert performance on PBS at 9 pm tomorrow evening.  February 20, 2014.

Seacor's ocean shipping subsidiary, Seabulk Tankers, currently owns and/or operates seven product carriers - five of the six Double Eagles and the two Avondale-built ships that were so notoriously double-hulled in China a few years ago.  Recently they ordered three new ships from NASSCO.  And now, for a change of pace, they have ordered a 185,000-barrel ATB.  Read their announcement here.  The barge will be built by Donjon Shipbuilding, in Erie: Donjon has never built a tank barge and apparently needs over two years to build this one.  Donjon built a dry-bulk ATB a coupla years ago, in which Seabulk was involved, and I'm told that a follow-up project had been expected.  But why would Seacor pay for Donjon to learn how to build tank barges?  And, although Donjon built the tug for the dry bulk ATB, the tug for this combo will be built by BAE Systems Jacksonville.  All very strange.  Finally, I'm told that BAE's contract includes an option for a second tug, so maybe there's an option on Donjon's contract too: nothing about options in Seabulk's announcement though.  February 12, 2014 (expanded and amended several times).

The U.S. Coast Guard has awarded firm-fixed-price contracts for the Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC) program to Bath Iron Works, Bollinger Shipyards and Eastern Shipbuilding.  Not selected were Ingalls and VT Halter Marine.  (Earlier casualties were Marinette, NASSCO and Vigor.)  Read the FedBizOps announcement here.  Read the Coast Guard's announcement here.  These are Phase I contracts, each for just less than $22 million, covering Preliminary and Contract Design: one of these three shipbuilders will be selected to continue to Detail Design and Construction of up to 11 cutters, with another 14 or so up for grabs after that.  The choice of contractors is interesting.  Bath - one of the "Big Five" and one of the best builders of surface combatants in the world.  Bollinger - one of the "Second Tier" and the yard that knows better than anyone what the Coast Guard wants.  And Eastern - an outsider in many ways but a yard which has increased its productivity, its output and its average ship size in recent years, which has moved into more complex and more valuable market sectors, and which has had the nous to team for this program with STX Marine USA, possibly the best naval architects in North America.  Who will win?  Well, it should be Bollinger: logic says that Bath is too expensive and Eastern too inexperienced, but there are a lot of conflicting factors at work here and early chicken-counting would be most unwise.  February 11, 2014.

Ingalls Shipbuilding has announced its acquisition of a 12-acre property in Moss Point, to be used for warehousing, as part of a "strategy to consolidate facilities."  Read their release here.  Buying a facility that is several miles away from their ludicrously over-sized monster of a shipyard could hardly be described as consolidation, but they talk a different language in HII.  This story is, of course, a non-event of a news item, one that I wouldn't normally bother to comment on, but it also contains this burst of humor from Mr. Edenzon:  "Improving efficiency and reducing leasing costs will help us make our ships more affordable so we can sell more ships."  This from the world's most expensive shipbuilder!  Really, who knew old Irwin could be so witty?  February 6, 2014.

The first of the big-deck carriers, the former USS Forrestal, (CV 59), left Philadelphia this morning on the first leg of the long 17-day tow to Brownsville TX and the recyclers' torches.  Built by Newport News, she was delivered in 1955 and retired in 1993.  Read the Philadelphia Inquirer's story here.  She's being towed by the 8,000-hp ocean tug Lauren Foss, and is currently zipping along at an average speed of about six knots.  February 4, 2014.

Back in 2007, Bollinger Shipyards started building a series of ten PSVs on spec. for a related entity called Bee Mar and then, in 2009, sold them en bloc to Harvey Gulf International.  If it works once, it'll work again, right?  So, in 2012, they created another Bee Mar and are currently building seven PSVs on spec.  And yesterday they sold them en bloc to Edison Chouest.  Good move.  February 4, 2014.

A further addition to the Vigor Industrial group was announced yesterday.  An agreement has apparently been reached for the acquisition of Seward Ship's Drydock, of Seward AK.  Read  Vigor's announcement here and visit the Seward yard's web site here.  See the shipyard from the air on Google here.  January 31, 2014.

MetalShark Boats, who are currently building up to 500 Response Boats (Small) for the Coast Guard and up to 350 High-Speed Maneuverable Surface Target (HSMST) boats for the Navy, is developing a new shipyard on a 25-acre site on the Charenton Commercial Canal, in Franklin LA, where they can build vessels up to 250 feet.  Read the story here.  Interesting location: Gulf Craft, one of the companies MetalShark will be competing with in these new markets, just moved its Patterson operation to a 25-acre site on the Charenton Commercial Canal.  See MetalShark's existing Jeanerette plant from the air on Google here and the Charenton Commercial Canal area here.  January 29, 2014.

Finland's YLE News reports that STX Finland has sold the Rauma shipyard to the City of Rauma.  Read the story here.  When STX bought Aker Yards Finland and created STX Finland, they had three shipyards, all building high-value ships but each focused on a different market sector.  The Turku yard built big cruise ships, including the 220,000-GT Oasis-class monsters; the Helsinki yard built icebreakers, mid-sized cruise ships and other high-value ships; and the Rauma yard built large ferries, offshore patrol vessels and the like.  None of the three were competitive, even by Western European standards, so STX's first move was to put the Helsinki yard into a joint venture with Russia's United Shipbuilding, to build icebreakers, which are, of course, government-financed.  Now they have dumped the Rauma yard, for the trivial sum of €18 million.  The City plans to turn it into an industrial park, with Rolls-Royce Marine already signed up as a tenant.  Does this theme sound familiar?  January 22, 2014.

Remember him?  He's the MIT graduate who created Massachusetts Heavy Industries and persuaded the Massachusetts congressional delegation to force a reluctant Maritime Administration to finance the reconstruction of the Quincy shipyard, using $55 million of Title XI funds.  When MHI defaulted, he went back to Greece and disappeared.  Well, now he's been arrested by the Greek authorities, for allegedly taking $31 million in bribes relating to a contract for the construction of German-designed submarines by Hellenic Shipyards, of which he used to be Chairman.  Read a splendidly comprehensive account of this saga in Defense Industry Daily, here.  January 19, 2014.

The future USNS Fall River, (JHSV 4), was floated yesterday, using Austal's uniquely complicated system.  Read Austal's announcement here.  It may be that the interesting thing here is that Austal is really stepping up the pace, with four ships now in the water and four launches scheduled this year.  They just launched LCS 6 last month, so they must be planning on launching LCS 8 this year, which would definitely represent an increase in the construction rate for that program.  They started their LCS program ten months behind Marinette, who just launched LCS 5 last month, and now appear to have at least caught up.  And launching JHSV 5 in the summer and JHSV 6 before the end of the year mean an increased pace on that program too.  Excellent!  January 18, 2014.

Overseas Shipholding Group, still working its way through bankruptcy, has turned over the management of its international fleet to V.Ships, the Monaco-based company that is the world leader in managing other people's ships.  Read OSG's announcement here.  OK, this is good news, not only because V.Ships are really good at what they do, but also because it should free up OSG's guys to concentrate on managing the domestic fleet, where their leadership position has been taken over by Crowley and Kirby.  January 18, 2014.

The second Mobile Landing Platform, the future USNS John Glenn, (T-MLP 2), has completed Builders Trials and will be christened on February 1, with delivery in March.  Read NAVSEA's announcement here.  Pretty quick work on the part of NASSCO, all things considered, but these are pretty basic ships.  The problem is that the third ship is not far behind the second.  Although NASSCO has a healthy backlog of commercial work - seven product carriers and two containerships - it's never healthy to have to shut down the government product line and the T-AO program continues to move at NAVSEA's now standard snail's pace.  In fact, snails are positively cougar-like compared to NAVSEA.   January 18, 2014.

Reliable sources report that US Shipping's 30-year-old T-5 tanker Houston, (ex-Gus W. Darnell), dumped contaminated ballast water recently, while discharging at Sun's Nederland terminal.  The contamination was apparently caused by crude leaking from the cargo tanks into the double bottom and, as a result, she is now in Gulf Copper's Port Arthur shipyard.  Significant cost and loss of revenue, of course, and it may not be all that simple to get the clearances needed to get her back in service.  Who would charter this old boat, anyway?  And all this follows on the problems US Shipping has been having trying to keep that other 30-year-old relic, Charleston, in service.  What an embarrassment US Shipping is to the US flag.  January 18, 2014.

Earlier this month, Aker Philadelphia started work on the first of the four product carriers they are contracted to build for Crowley.  Read Aker's announcement here.  Now my question is, can they improve their productivity?  On the first 14 product carriers, Aker reduced construction time initially but its later record was surprisingly erratic, especially for a yard that was specifically designed for series production.  Now they will be building in direct parallel with NASSCO and it will be interesting to make comparisons.  January 18, 2014.

In the past three years, Kirby Corporation has transformed itself from being primarily an inland tank barge operator to being as big a player in the ocean trades as in the inland trades.  Apparently 6.3 million barrels of capacity is not enough, however, and this week Kirby ordered an ATB with a capacity of 185,000 barrels from Gunderson Marine, with a 10,000-hp ATB tug from Nichols Bros.  Both contracts include an option.  Read Kirby's announcement here.  An interesting order: this will be the biggest barge ever built by Gunderson and, I think, the biggest tug ever built by Nichols.  January 18, 2014.

Back in 2002, the original plan was for 56 littoral combat ships, (LCSs), in a 375-ship Navy.  That held for a couple of years but in 2005 the goal was increased to 84 LCSs in a 325-ship Navy.  Wow! Shades of the Gary Hart Navy!  Of course, in those halcyon days, almost ten years ago, we didn't know what an LCS was going to cost.  Then in 2006, the number dropped back to being closer to the original plan: 55 LCSs in a 313-ship Navy.  That held good until last year's relatively minor adjustment to 52 LCSs in a 306-ship Navy.  But now here comes the big, bad DoD with an order that says 32 LCSs max.  So where does that number come from?  If we only build 32, how do we cover the missions that would have been covered by the other 20?  Isn't it amazing how fuzzy our fleet planning process is?  I wouldn't mind if we couldn't make up our minds about how many saucepans to buy for the Pentagon's kitchens, but we are talking about tens of billions of dollars of the taxpayers' money.  Of course, I'm always on the wrong side on this and similar issues.  I keep reminding people that the Cold War has now been over for 25 years and there is little prospect of another one any time soon, so why do we need all those submarines and carrier battle groups?  (Don't write and tell me: this is a column, not a blog.)  If we really feel the need to maintain a presence in every corner of the earth, why don't we do it in multinational task forces, instead of charging around like bullies in the playground?  This means more LCSs, not fewer.  Cut one carrier group and build more LCSs.  Cut some submarines and build more LCSs.  Cheaper ones, maybe, but still more.  Grrrr.  January 18, 2014.

Go to www.ShipbuildingHistory.com